Home » Traffic Congestion (Page 5)
Category Archives: Traffic Congestion
Maulan, ma-traffic
I just wanted to share this photo taken a couple of weeks ago when there were a few rainy days. These were not light rains but downpours that caused some flash flooding on streets along my commuting route. The flash floods plus vehicles generally slowing down due to the rains lead to traffic congestion. I thought this was what brought about the saying “maulan, ma-traffic” that translates into “it’s rainy so expect traffic congestion”.
Vehicles caught up in a traffic jam along Ortigas Avenue Extension–
Counterflow lane to Cainta Junction along Felix Avenue
Counterflow traffic schemes seem to be in these days. Cainta used the scheme temporarily while one lane of Felix Avenue was blocked due to the maintenance work being conducted by Manila Water. Following are photos showing the traffic advisory and photos during the counterflow.
Traffic advisory showing the period when the counterflow traffic scheme was implemented.
There was a median opening across from a factory’s main gate that allowed vehicles to counterflow.
The counterflow lane allowed vehicles to bypass the utilities maintenance works being performed by Manila Water’s contractor that blocked the median side lane of Felix Avenue.
Approach to Cainta Junction
The counterflow ends at Cainta Junction where left turning vehicles are positioned correctly for the movement. Through traffic were expected to occupy the other/normal approach lanes.
As the Manila Water concluded its maintenance work, the counterflow scheme was already lifted and traffic is back to normal.
–
On Undas traffic 2023
The past two years, I have not written about the traffic situation or conditions during Undas or the holidays corresponding to All Saints and All Souls Days (November 1 and 2). There wasn’t much to write about really. The usual traffic congestion would be along roads near cemeteries and memorial parks. Marikina City’s Barangka area and Bonifacio Avenue near Loyola Memorial are usually congested due to the city’s public cemetery and the memorial park combining for significant traffic generation during Undas. The days leading to Undas find people traveling, usually back to their hometowns but these days many go out for vacations instead. And so the roads near the airports, seaports and bus terminals are also congested. Tollways and national roads (especially the main corridors) can also be congested with the exodus of people from Metro Manila to the provinces in Luzon Island. I assume something similar occurs for other major cities as well.
Many people I know seem to be vacationing this week as they took advantage of the October 30 Barangay elections and the declaration of November 2 as a holiday to take the week off. Many probably took leaves for the two days that were not declared as holidays – October 31 (Tuesday) and November 3 (Friday). Many if not most schools I know declared a break for the week. It is, after all, an opportunity for students, teachers and school staff to take a breather. At UP though, this week came shortly after its Reading Break so its likely people were not able to gain momentum despite the opportunity to catch up on matters like assignments and correcting exams or papers.
I saw some social media posts early this week about expressways being congested. A few even opined that tollways were a scam because of the toll fees being collected despite congestion. I found those quite amusing as the alternative would have been national and local roads that would also be congested. Tollways have been proven to provide shorter travel times (and therefore higher level and quality of service) compared to the free roads. Also, its a free country so those who have their own vehicles may choose to take free roads. We also have apps like Waze to help us find alternative routes other than those that involve tollways. But for long distance travel (e.g., Manila to Baguio, Manila to Legazpi, etc.), tollways will always have the advantage over free roads. Of course, the timing of the travel also matters and the long Undas week should allow for some flexibility in travel especially those taking the road trips.
Here’s to a meaningful and reenergizing Undas!
–
Tikling junction traffic
Easily a pet peeve along my commute is Tikling or Kaytikling Junction in Taytay, Rizal. I think traffic here is worse than two other major junctions in Rizal Province – Cainta Junction and Masinag Junction in Antipolo City. And that is because of the combination of traffic management (or mismanagement) by elements of the Taytay Municipal Government and motorists lack of understanding of how vehicles should position (or travel) at roundabouts. Of course, the volume of motor vehicle traffic converging at this junction would probably merit traffic signals over a roundabout but for most times when there are no enforcers here, traffic is somewhat more efficiently flowing as drivers and riders are forced to give way in order to not constrict traffic.
Enforcers often employ the “buhos” system of prioritizing traffic for one leg at a time. However, instead of a quick transition from one leg to another, they tend to give more time to vehicles coming out of the Manila East Road and turning left and (west)bound for Ortigas Avenue Extension. The long time allocated to the latter means long queues for traffic coming down from Antipolo and those from Cainta.
Enforcers are partial to outbound traffic from Taytay rather than make an effort to have more equitable ‘go’ time for all legs at the junction.
One wonders who is in charge of traffic for Taytay considering they mismanage traffic everyday. [Though I also wonder why the rest of Rizal including Antipolo and Cainta can’t seem to be bothered by the congestion emanating from Tikling.] As if to prove the point of incompetence, another problematic intersection is the Highway 2000 – Barkadahan Bridge – East bank road intersection, which is signalized and yet somehow always congested (or saturated). But that’s another story.
–
A real battle of Katipunan – the search for a transportation solution
Is it obvious that I was alluding to the classic match-ups of the two major universities – Ateneo De Manila University and the University of the Philippines Diliman – that are located along Katipunan Avenue for the title of this article? That is deliberate on my part as there is a ‘real’ battle along Katipunan Avenue, and it does not involve sports.
Following is a recent article from the Philippine Collegian that reports on the current state of traffic along the corridor:
https://phkule.org/article/971/private-cars-mainly-to-blame-for-katipunan-traffic-transport-experts
I have written before and many times about transport and traffic along Katipunan Avenue. This road has been part of my daily commute since 1988 when I was admitted to UP Diliman as a B.S. Civil Engineering major. Back then Katipunan was not as wide as it is now, especially along the section between UP Diliman and the MWSS complex. That section only had 2 lanes then. What is not a wide center island with large, old acacia trees used to be the frontage of MWSS. So now you can probably imagine how much land was ceded by MWSS for road widening.
I also wanted to write about Katipunan in part as a sort of farewell to the former MMDA Chair and Marikina Mayor Bayani Fernando (BF), who recently passed away. Much of how Katipunan looks like and the traffic situation today can be traced to what transpired during his time at MMDA. I will refrain from writing about this and him for now. I am actually thinking of writing a series about BF and his time as Mayor in Marikina, as MMDA Chair, and his brief stint as DPWH Secretary. This short article will do for now.
A zipper lane along Katipunan?
Yesterday, the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) started another experiment along Katipunan Avenue in Quezon City. They introduced a zipper lane along the stretch fronting Ateneo’s Gate 2 and Miriam College’s main gate (about 740m – less than a kilometer). This single lane was supposed to ease traffic congestion along the northbound direction of Katipunan (aka Circumferential Road 5 or C5 or Pres. C.P. Garcia Avenue), which is saturated with vehicles especially during the morning peak.
While we wait for the official pronouncements regarding this experiment, the impacts are likely to be marginal as the original northbound lanes are jammed with vehicles. Thus, there is a tendency for the entry to the zipper lane to be blocked. MMDA staff will also have to stop vehicles at the exit if they will allow the movement of left-turning and U-turning vehicles at the junction with B. Gonzales and Miriam’s main gate. While it may seem an exercise in futility, we have to appreciate the continuing effort of MMDA for such schemes. The bottomline though is the MMDA has limited options to address the hellish traffic along Katipunan. The schools and other establishments would need to put their heads together to formulate a more sustainable solution for this corridor.
On reducing vehicle travel
This Sunday, I am sharing this article on the reduction of excess vehicle travel. I noted the use of the word ‘excess’ here, which somewhat distinguishes what is excess from what is necessary vehicle (or car) use.
Litman, T. (September 8, 2023) “How to reduce excess vehicle travel,” Planetizen, https://www.planetizen.com/blogs/125445-how-reduce-excess-vehicle-travel?utm_source=Planetizen+Updates&utm_campaign=b3ced8c873-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2023_08_09_05_38_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-6cce27a957-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D&mc_cid=b3ced8c873&mc_eid=9ccfe464b1 [Last accessed: 9/17/2023]
To quote from the article:
“Too often, practitioners undercount and undervalue slower but more affordable, inclusive, and resource-efficient modes such as walking, bicycling, and public transit. This contributes to the self-reinforcing cycle of automobile dependency and sprawl, illustrated below. We have an opportunity to break this cycle by recognizing the unique and important roles that walking, bicycling, and public transit can play in an efficient and equitable transportation system, and the cost efficiency of vehicle travel reduction policies. Telework can help, but only if implemented as part of an integrated program to create a more diverse, efficient and equitable transportation system.”
There is a lot you can pick up from this article, which sheds a light of hope towards addressing the most pressing issues particularly for our daily commutes. Litman is always clear and evidence-based for his discussions. His arguments are very persuasive if only decision-makers are not resistant to the facts about transport.
–
On one’s exposure to noise
Here is another article on noise, relating about how it affects our health (e.g., “noise can damage your heart as well as your hearing”). The article also includes reference to an app developed by the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) – a sound level meter iOS app that utilizes sound energy, and has its accuracy verified in an acoustics lab.
To quote from the article something related to transport and traffic:
“As a general rule of thumb, the World Health Organization considers average road traffic noise levels above 53 decibels and average aircraft noise levels above 45 dB to be associated with adverse health outcomes, though their metrics are weighted slightly differently than the average on your screen.
Nighttime noise is considered particularly harmful because it can fragment your sleep and prompt a stress response, even if you don’t remember waking up. The W.H.O. has long recommended less than 30 dB of nighttime noise inside your bedroom for high-quality sleep.”
We tend to dismiss or take for granted the noise from transport and traffic. While it seems that it does not have an effect on our health and well-being, it will eventually catch up with us and cost us health-wise. I have downloaded and installed the NIOSH app on my phone and occasionally monitor the noise around me whether I am at home or at the office. It can get pretty loud during my commutes and I drive so am curious how loud it can be for those taking public transportation. I have experienced riding in jeepneys blaring loud music. A daily dose of that for long periods each way of the commute will surely affect one’s hearing and overall health. Exposure, after all, isn’t just about the intensity of the noise but how long you experience or endure it.
–
A Serious Critique of Congestion Costs and Induced Vehicle Travel Impacts
Here is a quick share for today. This is an article by Todd Litman critiquing congestion costs and induced vehicle travel impacts:
Quoting from the article:
It is time for planners to rethink the way we evaluate congestion problems and solutions. Vehicle travel is not an end in itself; our ultimate goal is to improve accessibility. Traffic congestion is one constraint on accessibility, but others are more important. For example, the study, “Does Accessibility Require Density or Speed?” found that a given increase in urban density, and therefore proximity, has a far greater impact on overall accessibility than an increase in travel speed, and therefore congestion reductions. This is particularly true of disadvantaged groups who cannot drive or are financially burdened by vehicle expenses.
It is irresponsible for transportation agencies to expand highways in ways that contradict other community goals. If they do nothing, at worst, traffic congestion will maintain equilibrium; people will manage within its constraints. Even better, transportation agencies can invest in resource-efficient alternatives—better walking, bicycling, public transit, and telework opportunities—that improve accessibility, increasing transportation system efficiency.
If we truly want to truly optimize our transportation systems, we need a more comprehensive analysis of impacts and options, including the full costs of urban highway expansions and the full benefits of non-auto mode improvements and TDM incentives. Highway expansion should be a solution of last resort, only implemented when all other solutions have failed and users are willing to pay the full costs through tolls.
It’s time to stop obsessing about congestion and instead strive for efficient accessibility that serves everybody in the community.
Source: A Serious Critique of Congestion Costs and Induced Vehicle Travel Impacts
Traffic congestion at the UP Diliman campus
The University of the Philippines returned to face-to-face classes last week. That meant many students who have been admitted to the various programs of the university finally set foot on campus. Many, unsurprisingly, drove their own cars or were driven by their parents who themselves may probably were first-timers on campus, too. And given that many students come from middle to upper class families (they are the ones coming from the better schools and more likely to be admitted to UP), it is not surprising that many if not most have cars. The result is vehicles going around the campus even for short trips that could have been made by walking or cycling. Public transportation in the form of jeepneys were also affected as their routes were clogged by private cars. Jeepney users ended up similarly caught in traffic.
The same week, the UP Fair was also held. This was the first UP Fair in 2 years after the lockdowns. The trips generated by activities associated with the Fair contributed to the congestion along the main roads in the campus core. Note that much of the Academic Oval remained closed to traffic and these roads are the widest on campus. Still, portions were open to general traffic including sections to access the parking lot across from Palma Hall.
Will this congestion persist or will it go away eventually? Are a significant part of this actually through traffic? We’ll know very soon for sure once students settle down and realize going around on their cars are not the way to travel around the campus.
–
[Updates on this later]
Caught (up) in traffic 