Caught (up) in traffic

Home » EST

Category Archives: EST

How about a pop-up BRT along Commonwealth Avenue?

I posted this map on social media showing a possible route for a pop-up BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) along Commonwealth Avenue. This was inspired by the reports this week of the horrendous experience of commuters along this corridor due to the current fuel crisis. It seems that a lot of people have reduced their use of private vehicles in favor of what they thought was adequate public transportation only to find out how lacking the supply was.

While this route can be extended (all the way to Fairview via Regalado, for example), I think the one in the map below would be able to capture a majority of the commuters along the corridor with the end at Dona Carmen being a drop-off/pick-up area for those residing to the north.  Quezon City Hall and the Elliptical Road is a no-brainer since the Quezon City Bus service terminates here and people can transfer to one of the other lines that will allow them to travel elsewhere covered by the bus network. Quezon City or DOTr can lease buses and come up with a service contracting scheme to sustain operations. The idea is to first run this pop-up BRT while the crisis in Iran is ongoing. Data collection and assessments should coincide with this to refine the service and perhaps, make recommendations for sustaining this service at least until MRT 7 gets online.

The idea of a pop-up BRT is not really new as there were “proof of concept” runs along Commonwealth and at BGC many years ago. Unfortunately, the BRTs never came to be in both cases; both now missed opportunities as we have come to realize. It’s still a long way before the MRT 7 is up and running. The recent announcement from the proponent that they will probably start operations next year is perceived by many as too late. Government, both national and local, need to be decisive if they want people to be able to go to their workplaces and schools. Maybe this is another opportunity for the more than 70% public transport users to be provided with the services they need while taking advantage of road space being freed up from car dominance?

Some thoughts and reflections on transport and the Middle East crisis

Much has been said and written about the ongoing crisis brought about by the US and Israel attacking Iran and the latter retaliating. The prices of fuel have risen rapidly over the past weeks. Consequently, the prices of commodities have also risen. The Philippines is still very much dependent of fossil fuels for transportation with most travel using road-based transport. Even public transportation relies heavily on fossil fuels as buses and jeepneys are mostly using diesel engines. Even paratransit such as trikes and motorcycle taxis use gasoline.

While the energy mix in the country has become more diversified with renewables now having a substantial share, majority of power is produces using coal and natural gas. And so e-powered vehicles are also ultimately dependent on these fuels. Could we have had better transport that could have made our cities more resilient in light of the conflict in the Middle East? Probably, and if we followed and implemented the plans for mass transit systems that were laid out decades ago. Of course, this is already moot and academic given the current situation. The counterfactuals though point to better commuting conditions if projects have not been delayed or shelved.

A colleague and I were just discussing about how MRT 7 could have contributed to the reduction of car use along the Commonwealth Avenue corridor if it was completed according to the original schedule. That was 2019. Even with delays including the impact of the pandemic, it could have been completed a few years ago. If it was operational in 2023, commuters could have already shifted to rail from both private and public road-based transport modes. There was also actually a proposal for a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line along Commonwealth about 2 decades ago. That could have been constructed and operational ahead of Line 7 and could have already disrupted commuting preferences along the corridor if it were operated as a true BRT.

There’s just a lot of opportunities already missed that could have alleviated the fuel crisis we have now. Maybe we are really heading towards a bigger crisis when all these price increases lead to a more sweeping increase in the prices of commodities? We hope it doesn’t come to that but we seem to be helpless in this situation where we are caught unprepared for a war we are have nothing to do with.

The odd cyclist?

A couple weeks ago, we spotted this guy on a bicycle on our way to the office via Marcos Highway. It was easy to spot him along the highway as he pedaled along the middle lanes instead along the curbside or on the sidewalk. He was also a bit oddly dressed and there were some accessories to his bicycle.

The flag and other accessories on him and his bike are probably there to enhance safety. Motorists can easily see him for these.

The signs state “Kasangbahay” and “servants.” The person is probably a worker on his way to his workplace.

I remember seeing another cyclist in a Spiderman costume usually pedaling along Ortigas Avenue Extension. But that was pre-COVID-19 and I have not seen him (or was it a her) post-pandemic. These people add something amusing to the commute. We just hope they can travel safely every time.

At long last, the Cebu BRT is finally running

After more than two decades, the Cebu Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is finally operational (partly). I think I wrote about the BRT numerous times here. I was involved in the social marketing of the BRT to major cities almost 2 decades ago. At that time, only Cebu City was receptive to the idea as Metro Manila was more engrossed with railway projects that also took much gestation time. I was also involved in the pre-FS for Metro Manila BRT’s so I can say this has a lot of history and political economy about it.

Here is a report from Rappler via their official Facebook page:

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1J3Fpmar16/

I already look forward to the next trip to Cebu to have a first hand experience of the BRT there. I wanted to share photos from the internet here but perhaps I can wait til I have my own photos to share.

On at-grade crossings and footbridges

Here’s a quick share of an article on how at-grade crossings are generally better and preferred over footbridges:

When Footbridges Cost Lives and At-Grade Crossings Save Them

The article effectively articulates the case for at-grade crossings and presents the facts and references in support of these crossings. I will only add here that context is still important along with an appreciation or understanding of the volume of traffic and occupancy of vehicles along the roads. Commonwealth Avenue, for example, requires footbridges but there should be better designs for these footbridges than the current ones along this highway. I think we lack good designs that we can refer to and this leads to a summary dismissal of footbridges where they are actually most suitable.

On road clearing and towing of illegally parked vehicles

The MMDA conducted road clearing operations along Katipunan Avenue this Tuesday. To be exact, they towed illegally parked vehicles in the area. We saw a fleet of tow trucks lined along C.P. Garcia Avenue prior to the operations.

Vehicle being loaded on one of the MMDA tow trucks

There are many illegally parked vehicles along Katipunan and the side streets to it. It is partly due to parking minimums (as stipulated in the National Building Code) not being followed and mainly because of the dependence on cars and high car ownership attributed to residents there.

Operations like this by the MMDA or LGUs are important because spaces need to be reclaimed especially for pedestrians. There is of course their main objective of easing traffic along roads whose capacities were decreased by on street parking. Do these streets need to be redesigned? Maybe but not now considering the resources required for transformation. It’s not as easy as the examples being peddled on social media.

On street transformations using AI

My social media feed is full of images generated by artificial intelligence (AI). The street transformations are generated using a variety of AI tools. I’ve tried Canva and Gemini in producing similar images of street transformations; an exercise I’ve included in my undergraduate and graduate classes for more than a decade now but using their sketching and software (CAD, Sketch-up, etc.) skills to do the transformations. The photos below show an example of transformation along the University of the Philippines Diliman Academic Oval using Google Gemini.

The original photo I took at the UP Academic Oval

The first attempt at replacing the orange bollards/barriers with something that blended with the campus.

The second attempt showing plant boxes instead of the fence in the previous photo.

I think it’s possible to have excellent transformations of whatever roads or streets there are. One just needs to prompt or instruct the AI well enough to obtain these alternative designs. While the transformations are nice though, context is still important. Many of the transformations circulating on social media call for almost all major streets to be transformed. (Kulang na lang pati expressway gawan ng transformation.) Advocacy is good but context-sensitive solutions require a more constructive and cooperative. It certainly can do without being combative or antagonistic.

Article share: on how car-centric cities turn allies into adversaries

Here’s a quick share of an article on how allies can turn into enemies in cities where they have bad street designs:

Divide and Conquer: How Car-Centric Cities Turn Allies Into Adversaries by Urban Cycling Institute

CRB’25 scholarship recipient Reena Mahajan argues: When people walking and cycling are pitted against each other, drivers get a free ride

Read on Substack

https://substack.com/embedjs/embed.js

To quote from the article:

“Car culture thrives when we’re too busy blaming each other to notice its grip. The more we quarrel over scraps of space, the safer its dominance remains.

People walking, people on bikes, people on scooters, people in wheelchairs, parents with prams, toddlers and children: we are natural allies. Our fight is not with each other, but with a system that has normalised highways in cities, lethal SUVs and endless parking as the status quo of urban life.

Culture shifts slowly; the design of cities even more stubbornly. But solidarity can be rebuilt, not through polite appeals, but by refusing the script. By exposing the blame games. By demanding that cars, not people, yield the space, the attention, the scrutiny.

Every quarrel between walkers and cyclists is a gift to car culture. The sooner we stop fighting each other, the sooner we can fight the real enemy.”

I must add though that there seems to be an assumption or presumption in the case of such articles that are written from the experiences of developed countries that urban planning is okay and the problem is with traffic engineering. Thus, the tendency is to make traffic engineers the bad guys here. Context is quite important because in developing countries, urban planning might be flawed from the start and the street designs are the product of poor planning. It is easy to miss that traffic engineers in a country like the Philippines do not necessarily dictate street design. It begins with the planners and architects who often are praised when things are done right but shift the blame to traffic engineers when their (planners’ and/or architects’) designs fail.

“Nobody Walks Here. It’s Too Hot or Cold or Wet or Dry.”

I’m sharing this article as it provides a clear response to the question about walking under different circumstances. Those circumstances include weather conditions. How many times have we heard people saying “people won’t walk because it’s too hot or rainy” ? Maulan (rainy)! Mainit (too hot)! And yet we find a lot of people walking, even when its extremely hot or the rains are pouring.

Source: “Nobody Walks Here. It’s Too Hot or Cold or Wet or Dry.”

Quoting from the article:

“The human ability to adapt is the key to our spectacular success on this planet. Our problem is that the people who lead our public conversations, our elites of wealth and opinion, are often some of the least adaptable people on earth. And when societies assume that we should listen to those people, we all end up internalizing the message that there’s something wrong with us if we even try to walk…

…Sometimes walking a few blocks is the key to liberty and prosperity in someone’s life. Most people do what makes sense in the place where they live. Only if we recognize that will we make the investments in urban design to make walking more bearable in extreme weather. And only then will our cities include everyone.”

Here’s another quote and a take on what certain people say that often influences our choice for walking:

“The functionality of a city, and of its transport system, arises from the sum of everyone’s choices about how to travel, not just the preferences of elites. When elites make pronouncements about what “people” will tolerate, while really speaking only of themselves, they mislead us about how cities actually succeed. They also demean the contributions of the vast majority of people who are in fact tolerating extreme weather to do whatever will give their lives meaning and value.”

On parking for typhoons

The Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) recently issued a memo to shopping mall operators in Metro Manila in relation to the anticipated arrival and onslaught of a super typhoon. I reproduce the memo below:

As of this morning, most if not all mall operators (at least all of the major ones – SM, Robinsons, Ayala and Megaworld) have responded positively. Some observations this morning though shows a lot of people already lining up their vehicles at the malls to take advantage of the free parking. It seems a lot of people have misunderstood the memo and responses (from the malls) to mean there’s free parking from today til Monday. Let’s assume that most of these people live in flood prone areas and that many of them probably don’t have garages in their homes. This somewhat shows us another angle of vehicle ownership and the lack of parking for many. It also somehow tells us something about our dependency on cars and how we really need to have a better transportation system.